BTC USD 61,702.5 Gold USD 4,328.60
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

Weekly Rundown šŸ“Š

Are you happy with the new content I’ve been sharing so far?

  • Yes, I’m enjoying it

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • It’s okay, could use some tweaks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I prefer the daily calendar to the weekly calendar

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I'd like personal assistance with understanding trading

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .

Attila

Fun Poster
Messages
221
Joined
Apr 16, 2024
Messages
221
Reaction score
1
Points
15

Revaluing Gold: How Washington Could Unlock $800 Billion Without Raising Debt

For decades, gold has sat on the U.S. balance sheet at a token valuation of $42.22 per ounce—an official figure unchanged for generations—but mounting fiscal strain and a national debt exceeding $37 trillion suggest that number may soon change. In an unusual acknowledgment that gold still holds relevance in U.S. monetary policy, the Federal Reserve recently referenced the metal in an official report, aligning with draft versions of President Trump’s proposed Bitcoin Act circulating in both the Senate and House. These bills explicitly outline a plan to revalue America’s official gold reserves—a process that, if approved, could unfold as early as 2026—to fund new sovereign wealth and Bitcoin reserve initiatives, redefining gold’s statutory value under 31 U.S. Code §5117. Repricing gold to around $3,400 an ounce could instantly ā€œcreateā€ nearly $800 billion in debt-neutral liquidity—capital that might finance these funds without formally expanding the federal debt. Supporters hail it as an innovative way to rebalance public finances, while critics warn it mirrors a sophisticated form of quantitative easing that could trigger inflationary shockwaves worldwide. Should the U.S. move forward, other central banks may follow, reanchoring their currencies to tangible assets even as fiat values continue to erode. Whether the goal is to ease America’s debt burden or to redefine reserves for a digital age, the implications are profound: gold—once dismissed as a barbarous relic—may again become the measure of monetary credibility, and the next chapter of U.S. finance could well be written in both gold and code.

Gemini_Generated_Image_k8kfkqk8kfkqk8kf.png



Disclaimer: The information discussed reflects ongoing market speculation and legislative proposals. As of now, the U.S. government has not announced or approved any official revaluation of its gold reserves. Figures such as $800 billion in liquidity are based on independent analyst estimates, not formal projections from the Treasury or Federal Reserve.
 
Crypto Markets Stumbled as Tariffs Triggered Volatility and Record Liquidations

As markets moved through the week of October 13–19, 2025, the cryptocurrency market endured intense volatility as a combination of geopolitical shocks and record liquidations unsettled investor confidence. Bitcoin tumbled from earlier highs near $122,000 to its lowest level in several months during a broad market sell-off, while Ethereum shed over 12%, briefly dipping to its weakest point since early summer before recovering modestly. The sharp decline followed U.S. President Trump’s surprise announcement of 100% tariffs on Chinese tech exports, sparking over $19 billion in crypto liquidations—one of the largest on record. Although Bitcoin and Ethereum regained some ground by week’s end, they closed lower, with BTC near $107,000 and ETH around $3,850. Altcoins like XRP and Solana mirrored this pattern, plunging early in the week but rebounding on renewed risk sentiment and bullish options activity. Despite global macroeconomic pressures, including trade tensions, a U.S. government shutdown, and shifting Fed rate expectations, the total crypto market cap remained relatively stable around $3.65 trillion. Analysts noted that the week’s turbulence flushed out excess leverage, possibly setting the stage for more measured trading ahead, as crypto markets showed resilience amid heightened uncertainty.
 

Market Brief | Fed Decision & U.S.–China Trade Framework​

What you’re looking at: A two-part, fact-first snapshot of this week’s macro swing factors — the Federal Reserve’s rate call and the U.S.–China trade framework ahead of the Oct 30 meeting.

Federal Reserve — setup for Wed, Oct 29, 2025
The Federal Reserve will decide rates Wednesday amid a shutdown-driven data blackout, with economists expecting a 25 bp cut after September CPI rose 3.0% y/y, softer than the 3.1% forecast. Fed funds futures imply a ~97% chance of easing, which would lower the target range to 3.75%–4.00% and mark a second cut this year, as officials prioritize a cooling labor market while inflation remains contained. Chair Jerome Powell has said alternative public and private data suggest the outlook is little changed since September, and several banks expect another cut in December. A further step down in policy rates would pressure borrowing costs tied to the prime rate and has already helped pull the 30-year mortgage average to 6.19% — its lowest in a year — though much of the easing is seen as priced in.

U.S.–China — framework ahead of Thu, Oct 30, 2025
The U.S. and China agreed a framework for a trade deal ahead of the Xi–Trump meeting set for October 30, 2025, in South Korea, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent saying the pact would avert planned 100% tariffs on Chinese imports from November 1 and include a ā€œfinal dealā€ on TikTok. Beijing would delay export controls on key minerals for a year and revive large U.S. soybean purchases, while both sides paused punitive actions to improve access to rare earths and narrow the trade gap. Chinese negotiator Li Chenggang said a ā€œpreliminary consensusā€ would now undergo internal approvals. The development eased fears of a global trade war threatening European car production, as the U.S. also pursued a tariff truce with Brazil following a ā€œpositiveā€ Trump–Lula meeting amid recent tariff escalations.

Bottom line
This piece previews the week’s two headline drivers — the Fed decision (Wed, Oct 29, 2025) and the U.S.–China framework (Thu, Oct 30, 2025) — and explains what to watch and why it matters.
 
That’s a fascinating and thought-provoking analysis. Revaluing gold could indeed unlock significant liquidity without officially raising debt, but it also blurs the line between fiscal creativity and monetary manipulation. While it might stabilize reserves or fund innovation, the inflationary and geopolitical ripple effects could be immense. It’s a bold idea—potentially brilliant or dangerously destabilizing, depending on execution and timing.
 
U.S. Government Shutdown Threatens to Break Record as Economic Risks Grow

The U.S. government shutdown has entered its 33rd day and is poised to become the longest in history, with no resolution in sight as political tensions deepen. At the core of the impasse is a battle over Affordable Care Act subsidies, set to expire by year-end. President Trump has stated he ā€œwon’t be extortedā€ by Democrats and refuses to negotiate until the government is reopened, while Senate Democrats demand talks before any funding bill moves forward. As the stalemate drags on, essential programs such as SNAP food assistance and healthcare subsidies face disruption, and hundreds of thousands of federal workers remain unpaid — including air traffic controllers, prompting delays at major airports. Meanwhile, Trump has renewed calls to eliminate the Senate filibuster, further complicating efforts toward a bipartisan solution. Despite ongoing discussions among moderates, a legislative breakthrough remains elusive, heightening public frustration as federal operations deteriorate.

Economically, a prolonged shutdown risks reducing household consumption, weakening GDP growth, and eroding consumer confidence — particularly if essential benefits are cut and federal pay disruptions continue. It also delays critical data releases and government functions, adding uncertainty for businesses and policymakers alike. If the deadlock continues, the economic strain could compound, with broader consequences across labor markets, service industries, and overall financial sentiment.
 
Absolutely, Aaron — well said. Revaluing gold could offer a clever liquidity boost, but as you noted, it walks a fine line between innovation and risk. Execution and market perception would be critical.
That’s a fascinating and thought-provoking analysis. Revaluing gold could indeed unlock significant liquidity without officially raising debt, but it also blurs the line between fiscal creativity and monetary manipulation. While it might stabilize reserves or fund innovation, the inflationary and geopolitical ripple effects could be immense. It’s a bold idea—potentially brilliant or dangerously destabilizing, depending on execution and timing.
 

Wednesday 19.11.2025​


Netflix Price Drop Explained: Stock Split, Earnings Noise, and Market Optics

Netflix Inc. (NASDAQ: NFLX) is one of the world’s leading streaming platforms, with growing revenue from advertising, gaming, and international content. After a strong multi-year rally pushed its share price above $1,000, Netflix became a key barometer for tech and growth sentiment. To improve accessibility and liquidity, the company approved a 10-for-1 stock split, which later shaped how its mid-November price action looked on the chart.

On October 21, 2025, Netflix reported Q3 2025 earnings: revenue was solid, but a $619 million tax charge in Brazil weighed on net profit and slightly dented confidence. Then, on Friday, November 14, the stock closed at $1,112.45 in its pre-split form. When trading resumed on Monday, November 17, shares opened at $111.01 as the 10-for-1 split took effect. On paper this created a 90% drop in the share price, even though the company’s overall market value stayed broadly unchanged – visually it looked like a crash, but it was mainly the split plus an already sensitive backdrop.

Why Netflix’s ā€œCrashā€ Was Mostly a Chart Illusion​

The sharp gap from above $1,100 to just over $110 triggered reactions from both traders and algorithms, which often treat large price gaps as volatility events even when fundamentals haven’t changed overnight. At the same time, months of strong gains and repeated comments about rich valuations meant some investors were already cautious, so the split’s optics – combined with recent earnings noise – made the move appear worse than it was.

In the days after the split, price action stabilised, with smaller candles and tighter ranges that fit a typical post-split liquidity reset rather than ongoing panic. Netflix’s underlying business remained focused on scaling its ad tier, monetising password sharing, and expanding its global content portfolio. From a fundamental standpoint, nothing ā€œbrokeā€ over that weekend – the chart simply shifted from a four-digit price to a three-digit one as the same company was divided into more, lower-priced shares.

Takeaway:

Netflix’s apparent ā€œcrashā€ on November 17 was largely a mechanical effect of a 10-for-1 stock split, amplified by earlier earnings noise and valuation concerns. For traders and investors, it’s a reminder that not every huge gap on a chart reflects collapsing fundamentals – sometimes it’s just the market repricing the same business into a new share structure.

The chart below tracks Netflix’s price movement between 21 October and 18 November 2025, with the most recent value captured at 20:30 PM GMT.

Netflix.jpg
 
Last edited:
Thursday 20th November 2025

Novorossiysk Attack: Geopolitics and a Quick Oil Spike

Geopolitics is about how conflicts and political decisions between countries affect the world. In energy markets, this matters a lot: when a major export route is hit, oil prices can move within minutes. The attack on Russia’s Novorossiysk port is a clear example.

On 14 November 2025, Ukrainian missile and drone strikes hit the Sheskharis oil terminal in Novorossiysk, Russia’s main Black Sea export hub. Two oil berths were damaged and exports from Novorossiysk and a nearby CPC terminal were temporarily stopped. In total, around 2.2 million barrels per day of supply were at risk, roughly 2% of global supply, with 700–761 kbd of Russian crude directly affected. Limited CPC loadings resumed the same day, but full loadings at Novorossiysk only restarted on 16 November, with tankers like the Arlan and Rodos returning to load.


WTIUSD Reaction

The WTIUSD chart shows how the market reacted:

  • On 14 November, WTIUSD opened at 58.76, jumped to a high of 60.67, and closed at 59.96 as traders priced in supply risk.
  • After the weekend, on 17 November, WTIUSD opened at 59.51, slightly below Friday’s close, as news of resumed loadings helped calm the market.

Takeaway​

The Novorossiysk attack shows how fast geopolitics can move oil. A single strike on a key export hub briefly put about 2% of global supply at risk and pushed WTI from 58.76 to 60.67 in one session. The comparison between 14 and 17 November makes it clear: when supply looks vulnerable, prices jump first — and then adjust as more information comes in.



The chart below illustrates how WTIUSD reacted on the 5-minute candlestick timeframe in the immediate aftermath of the Novorossiysk attack, highlighting the sharp intraday spike, the subsequent pullback, and the opening levels when trading resumed after the weekend.

WTIUSD.jpg
 
Tuesday 25th November 2025

SOL/USD Market Summary: 18–25 Nov 2025​

In this post, we look at how Solana (SOL/USD) moved between 18 and 25 November 2025, and what market forces likely drove that behaviour even without a single big Solana-specific news event.

SOL/USD reflects how much one Solana token is worth in US dollars. Solana is known for moving quickly when market sentiment changes, so even without direct Solana-specific news, its price is often shaped by what’s happening across the broader crypto market.

Between 18 and 25 November 2025, Solana’s movement was not driven by one single news headline. Instead, it followed the general behaviour of the crypto market during that week. The period began with a wave of risk-on sentiment across altcoins, which lifted Solana as traders looked for higher-return opportunities. Strong activity across Solana’s ecosystem also supported this early momentum.

Midweek, the trend reversed. Traders started taking profits, leveraged positions were unwound, and overall market confidence softened as investors reacted to mixed U.S. macro headlines and shifting expectations around risk assets. With no Solana-specific catalyst to hold the price up, SOL followed the broader market pullback and moved lower.

Toward the end of the week, the environment calmed. Bitcoin steadied, crypto inflows improved, and investors returned to altcoins after the midweek drop. This allowed Solana to recover a good portion of the decline as dip buyers stepped back in.

In short, Solana’s movement during this period wasn’t caused by a direct Solana headline. It was driven by overall crypto sentiment — first enthusiasm, then caution, and finally a natural rebound once market conditions stabilised.

The chart below shows how SOLUSD moved between November 18 and 25, 2025, highlighting important highs, lows, and market reactions.

SOLUSD.jpg
 
Monday 1st December 2025

Tesla Weekly Recap (24-28 November 2025): AI Optimism Meets Sales Pressure​

Tesla, Inc. (NASDAQ: TSLA) is a major name in electric cars, self-driving technology and AI. It designs much of its own hardware and software, from batteries to robots and energy storage, so investors often treat it like both a car company and a tech company.

From 24 to 28 November 2025, Tesla’s share price moved sharply up and down. Part of the move came from excitement around its AI plans, while another part came from worries about slowing car sales. The week clearly showed this split: big hopes for the future, but growing questions about the near term.


Tesla Shares Rally on AI Hopes, Then React to Weak Sales​

The week started strong. On 24 November, Tesla climbed as investors focused on comments about progress in its AI chips and self-driving roadmap. Some analysts said Tesla could become a key AI platform in transport and called it a ā€œmust-ownā€ name in that space.

But the mood changed in the middle of the week. A Reuters report said Tesla’s October sales in Europe had fallen sharply compared with a year earlier. That reminded the market of real-world problems: tougher competition, customers sensitive to price cuts, and rivals gaining ground. Traders began to ask whether the AI story alone was enough to offset weaker demand for Tesla’s cars.

As a result, the stock traded in wide swings: it pushed higher on AI headlines, then pulled back when sales worries resurfaced. The market was caught between liking Tesla’s long-term tech story and being cautious about its current business performance.


Takeaway​

Tesla’s week showed two sides of the same story:

  • Supportive side: AI and self-driving plans kept investors interested and helped drive early-week gains.
  • Cautious side: Slower vehicle sales, especially in Europe, reminded everyone that Tesla is still heavily dependent on its core car business.
Going into December, traders are watching to see which side will matter more in the price: the long-term AI and technology promise, or the short-term pressure from softer car demand and delivery numbers.

The chart below illustrates Tesla’s price movements on the 5-minute timeframe from November 24 to 28, 2025, highlighting key highs, lows, and notable market reactions throughout the week.


TESLA New (1).jpg
 

Live Forex Chart

Currency
Rates
EUR / USD
1.15216
USD / JPY
160.310
GBP / USD
1.33905
USD / CHF
0.79340
USD / CAD
1.39325
EUR / JPY
184.702
AUD / USD
0.70520
Back
Top
Log in Register