BTC USD 80,819.5 Gold USD 4,353.00
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

Riza Aziz dilepas tanpa dibebaskan

Politics is all about perception.

kalau kau dapat burukan nama seseorang tu, bayang dia pun orang boleh benci.. walau pun dia tak salah pun dari awal

lepas bertahun, ramai rakyat msia yg dah boleh baca wayang dan sembang seseorang ahli politik berpidato.. ;)
 
najib sembang kencang penglipur lara zaman moden.. ape beza dua2 kes???

pendakwa tak cukup bukti kononnya... tapi reza bayar pampasan....

Jika dia masih tak faham, sila tanya lawyer dia yang kata perjanjian penyelesaian Riza Aziz adalah wajar.kerana bukti Riza melakukan kesalahan kurang, kes akan mengambil masa yang lama dan tiada jaminan pendakwa raya akan menang dalam mahkamah:

manakala...kenapa UMNO, Wanita MCA, Perano Sdn Bhd dan Binsabi Sdn Bhd. fight kes sebb membuktikan duit tu bukan dari sumber 1mdb

SPRM kemuka rayuan kes lucut hak RM194 juta
ROSALWANI CHE SOH @ YUSOFF | | 23 Jun 2020

A
A
KUALA LUMPUR - Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) akan mengemukakan rayuan ke Mahkamah Rayuan berkaitan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur yang menolak saman kerajaan untuk melucut hak wang berjumlah RM194 juta didakwa berkaitan dana 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).


SPRM berkata, permohonan rayuan akan difailkan oleh pihak pendakwaan daripada Jabatan Peguam Negara terhadap empat entiti iaitu UMNO, Wanita MCA, Binsabi Sdn Bhd dan Perano Sdn Bhd.

“Tempoh rayuan yang diberikan adalah dua minggu dari tarikh keputusan mahkamah,” katanya dalam satu kenyataan hari ini.



Pada 19 Jun lalu, UMNO, Wanita MCA serta dua pihak lagi kekal memiliki semula wang berjumlah RM194 juta yang disita sebelum ini berhubung skandal 1MDB.

Ia berikutan keputusan Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur yang menolak permohonan pihak pendakwaan untuk menangguhkan keputusan mahkamah yang sebelumnya menolak saman perlucutan hak terhadap UMNO, Wanita MCA, Perano Sdn Bhd dan Binsabi Sdn Bhd.

Sementara itu, pada 7 Februari lalu, mahkamah menolak saman perlucutan hak oleh kerajaan terhadap UMNO, Wanita MCA, Perano dan Binsabi untuk mendapatkan wang berjumlah RM194 juta yang didakwa dari 1MDB.

Pihak pendakwaan menuntut melucutkan wang RM192 juta dari UMNO, RM300,000 dari Wanita MCA, RM337,634,78 dari Perano dan RM777,250 dari Binsabi.

Namun pihak pendakwaan memohon penangguhan bagi mengelakkan wang tersebut dikembalikan kepada keempat-empat responden sementara menunggu rayuannya ke Mahkamah Rayuan.
Artikel Penuh : https://www.sinarharian.com.my/arti...h/SPRM-kemuka-rayuan-kes-lucut-hak-RM194-juta
© 2018 Hakcipta Terpelihara Kumpulan Karangkraf
 
dilepas tanpa dibebaskan.. terbaik... so masih boleh di dakwa pada masa depan...
 
Najib Razak
5 hrs ·

MENJAWAB STEALING CHICKENS
23 June 2020

1. Najib seems upset about my “veiled suggestion that the discharge secured by filmmaker Riza Aziz was wrong”.

Najib: Yes, I am upset that you continue to lie through your teeth. You conveniently ignored that the settlement was started by the Attorney General which you appointed (and who admitted he was a political appointee) while you were still PM.

For starters, unlike Guan Eng, Riza was never charged for abuse of power, theft (curi) or corruption. He was charged under the AMLA act for receiving funds that were give to him by foreign government entities that had partnership with 1MDB.

Riza never received a single dollar direct from 1MDB. In fact, he was seldom in Malaysia throughout those years.

Similarly, he was also never charged for abuse of power, theft or corruption by the DOJ USA despite the fact that majority of the investments were received, used and returned from the USA.

Not a single transactions happened in Malaysia or involved Malaysian banks.

If you still have any doubts whether the settlement was the best move for the government, please consult your own lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla who says the settlement was prudent.

"Riza's DNAA is prudent, says lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri"

If you do not agree with your lawyer, believe he is talking rubbish or lying then please sack him as your lawyer.

2. I still maintain that it was a sweetheart deal where you steal US$248 million from 1MDB money and you give back US$107.3 million and keep over US$140 million to enjoy.

3. The fact is that you stole from 1MDB US$248 million and the whole amount should be returned. What you pay to somebody else is irrelevant.

Najib replies for 2 and 3: As already explained by our lawyers, the US$248 million was the total sums received by the various investors for Riza's film projects. Out of which:

- US$107 million is settled here in Malaysia.

- US$60 million was settled with the DOJ last year which the DOJ then sent to Malaysia. (you forgot about this?)

- US$120 million has been repaid back to investors along with interest and dividends due to the film projects. These repayments made long ago were also referred to in the phone call recordings between me and the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi which your own MACC political appointee head exposed to the public earlier this year.

Transcript start:
Najib: He’s paid back some, he continues to repay, so that it would appear as a legitimate loan agreement, which it is, you see. Because when he received it, the banks cleared the source of money so he was not aware at all where it came from.

So I don’t want him to be a victim when he was totally unaware of the source of money. He genuinely believed that it was from Aabar and under the instruction of Sheikh Mansour, you see.

Remember, Your Highness, also talked about helping him when he was in Abu Dhabi?

Najib: Yeah, that’s right, because he is totally innocent. All he wanted was to make movies, and there was an offer of a loan from Sheikh Mansour and your side from Aabar, and also you mentioned it. Remember? When we had lunch at the restaurant about supporting him so he thought everything was fine, you see. Now, they’re trying to connect him with 1MDB money, which totally… came as a shock to him.
Transcript end:

4. It is like stealing 10 chickens. You should give back all the 10. If you had had a feast of 9 chickens or you sold them to someone, it does not matter. The 10 chickens must be returned to the owner. Giving 1 back will still mean that the chicken owner has lost 9 chickens stolen by the thief.

Najib: As explained many times, all 1MDB transactions where money was deemed missing was either guaranteed or paid to Abu Dhabi government-owned IPIC.

Do you deny that there was a settlement agreement between Malaysia and Abu Dhabi signed in 2017 where IPIC had agreed to return all the alleged 1MDB missing money before 30 December 2020? Do you want to view the settlement agreement? I have a fully signed and executed copy if you want to see. If the court case was not on-going, I would have posted this up by now.

And this was the same agreement that your PH government did not want to honour and follow-up to get back the money. In fact, the PH government wanted to cancel the settlement agreement so that the 1MDB money continues to be classified as "missing" and not "due to be returned" under the agreement as no 1MDB money missing means Najib is not a thief.

Do you deny this?

5. You say my (PM 7) children were given Government contracts.

6. I did not even allow my children to do business in Malaysia, much less get Government contracts. They were not even given Government scholarships except Mirzan who got it before I became a member of Parliament in 1964. And Mirzan had to pay back 25%.

7. Only after I stepped down were they doing business in Malaysia – even then not with the Government. Certainly no Government contracts.

8. Please give documentary evidence of the contracts given to my children, just as documentary evidence proved that you as MO1 had taken money from 1MDB.

9. Please explain the sweetheart deals involving PM 7 cronies. Did Riza Aziz buy or did my children buy. And who are the cronies?

Oh? Your children never did any business in Malaysia while you were PM? And only after you stepped down that they started doing business?

Then was Mirzan your son when he built up Konsortium Perkapalan in the 1990s which eventually needed a bail-out from Petronas via MISC in the economic crisis of 1998?

MISC to Pay $220 Million Price For Assets From Mahathir's Son

Wasn't MISC and Petronas reporting to you as PM at that time?

Was Mirzan your son in the year 1996 and who was the PM then when Vincent Tan's brother Danny Tan sold Diperdana Corp to Mirzan just two years after Danny bought the company?

Diperdana Stake Is Sold in Deal Said to Be Tied to Mahathir's Son

Was Mohzani your son in 1997 and where you the PM in 1997 when he became the largest shareholder of the Hospital Pantai group after buying it from the Vincent Tan controlled Berjaya group?

Subsequently, the FOMEMA concessions and the governmetn hospitals supplies contract was awarded to that group while you were still PM.

Were you also PM when Mokhzani's Kencana group founded a year before was awarded a major fabrication (Offshore Structures) license by PETRONAS in the year 2002. Kencana Petroleum is one of only seven licensees in Malaysia awarded at that time.


Were you PM of Malaysia in 2002 and were you the advisor of Petronas even after you step down as PM in 2003 until 12 years later in the period where your son made billions from doing business with Petronas?

Were you also PM in the year 2003 where your son Mukhirz owned Opcom and the company was awarded a direct award without tender contract worth RM214 million by Telekom Malaysia on the direct instruction of the Ministry of Finance? (see attached letter).

This contract was instrumental to Opcom's successful listing later that year where another bundle was made.

Who was Minister of Finance and Prime Minister in 2003?

As for your second sting as PM, was it true that the RM21.6 bilion National Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan (NFCP) was the only mega-project rushed through and announced by the PH government and approved by cabinet in record time?

And was it true that Opcom shares jumped 50% upon the project being announced as it would be one of the main beneficiary of that project?

"Opcom rose 18.5 sen or 41.11% to 63.5 sen. Opcom's share price rise could be due to news that the Malaysian Cabinet had today approved the implementation of the National Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan (NFCP)

Who were the major shareholders and chairperson of Opcom then? Oh.. that's right. Two out of your three sons.

And can you deny that mere months before you retired as PM the first time in 2003, you gave a 20 year exclusive concession for sports and football betting to a Vincent Tan owned private company without tender and without cabinet approval?

This concession could potentially be worth tens of billions of Ringgit but the awarded company only had to pay a fee of only RM20 million.

"2004: A previously undisclosed license for a potentially lucrative Malaysian gambling concession granted to gaming tycoon Vincent Tan Chee Yioun by former Premier Mahathir Mohamad is stirring controversy within the country's government."

Gaming License Sparks Contention in Malaysia

So, don't talk about stealing or returning chickens. Under you, the entire hen-house was handed to the cronys to be slaughtered.

10. Incidentally, please explain why the great movie “The Wolf of Wall Street” had not been screened in Malaysia. Is it true that it is a pornographic film?

It is not a pornographic film. Yes, it has scenes of drug use and some nudity but it is not a pornographic film. It is rated "R" in the USA - the same as films like the Joker, Deadpool 1 and 2, The Matrix Reloaded, Ted, American Sniper, The Passion of the Christ, Saving Private Ryan and many others.

The Wolf of Wall Street is listed at number 39 in this list:

These are not the "X-rated" films that you think it is.

Incidentally, the Wolf of Wall street grossed US$392 million (RM1.68 bilion) in ticket sales world-wide with not a single dollar being Malaysian government contracts.

Other successful Riza produced films includes Dumb and Dumber To (US$170 million or RM727 million) and Daddy's Home (US$243 million or RM1.04 billion - both of which are shown in Malaysian cinemas.

 
adakah sebab perumpamaan ini menyebabkan ayam mahal sekarang? hampir RM10 kg.

so, kalau menurut statement2 media, maksudanya Riza ni orang baik? tiada pertuduhan mencuri , hanya menggunakan dana tanpa sah..

masih tak berapa paham... ayat2 di gunakan media agak sukar di pahami oleh saya yg berotak udang..
Reza tuu anak khalid...jadi senang mudah/dpermudah dpt pinjaman

Dengan erti kata lain khalid mperkudakan kuasa veto dia luluskan pinjaman...tak salah kot

Cuba reza tuu anak najib...adakah loan reza akan di luluskan
 
Najib Razak
5 hrs ·

MENJAWAB STEALING CHICKENS
23 June 2020

1. Najib seems upset about my “veiled suggestion that the discharge secured by filmmaker Riza Aziz was wrong”.

Najib: Yes, I am upset that you continue to lie through your teeth. You conveniently ignored that the settlement was started by the Attorney General which you appointed (and who admitted he was a political appointee) while you were still PM.

For starters, unlike Guan Eng, Riza was never charged for abuse of power, theft (curi) or corruption. He was charged under the AMLA act for receiving funds that were give to him by foreign government entities that had partnership with 1MDB.

Riza never received a single dollar direct from 1MDB. In fact, he was seldom in Malaysia throughout those years.

Similarly, he was also never charged for abuse of power, theft or corruption by the DOJ USA despite the fact that majority of the investments were received, used and returned from the USA.

Not a single transactions happened in Malaysia or involved Malaysian banks.

If you still have any doubts whether the settlement was the best move for the government, please consult your own lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri Abdulla who says the settlement was prudent.

"Riza's DNAA is prudent, says lawyer Mohamed Haniff Khatri"

If you do not agree with your lawyer, believe he is talking rubbish or lying then please sack him as your lawyer.

2. I still maintain that it was a sweetheart deal where you steal US$248 million from 1MDB money and you give back US$107.3 million and keep over US$140 million to enjoy.

3. The fact is that you stole from 1MDB US$248 million and the whole amount should be returned. What you pay to somebody else is irrelevant.

Najib replies for 2 and 3: As already explained by our lawyers, the US$248 million was the total sums received by the various investors for Riza's film projects. Out of which:

- US$107 million is settled here in Malaysia.

- US$60 million was settled with the DOJ last year which the DOJ then sent to Malaysia. (you forgot about this?)

- US$120 million has been repaid back to investors along with interest and dividends due to the film projects. These repayments made long ago were also referred to in the phone call recordings between me and the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi which your own MACC political appointee head exposed to the public earlier this year.

Transcript start:
Najib: He’s paid back some, he continues to repay, so that it would appear as a legitimate loan agreement, which it is, you see. Because when he received it, the banks cleared the source of money so he was not aware at all where it came from.

So I don’t want him to be a victim when he was totally unaware of the source of money. He genuinely believed that it was from Aabar and under the instruction of Sheikh Mansour, you see.

Remember, Your Highness, also talked about helping him when he was in Abu Dhabi?

Najib: Yeah, that’s right, because he is totally innocent. All he wanted was to make movies, and there was an offer of a loan from Sheikh Mansour and your side from Aabar, and also you mentioned it. Remember? When we had lunch at the restaurant about supporting him so he thought everything was fine, you see. Now, they’re trying to connect him with 1MDB money, which totally… came as a shock to him.
Transcript end:

4. It is like stealing 10 chickens. You should give back all the 10. If you had had a feast of 9 chickens or you sold them to someone, it does not matter. The 10 chickens must be returned to the owner. Giving 1 back will still mean that the chicken owner has lost 9 chickens stolen by the thief.

Najib: As explained many times, all 1MDB transactions where money was deemed missing was either guaranteed or paid to Abu Dhabi government-owned IPIC.

Do you deny that there was a settlement agreement between Malaysia and Abu Dhabi signed in 2017 where IPIC had agreed to return all the alleged 1MDB missing money before 30 December 2020? Do you want to view the settlement agreement? I have a fully signed and executed copy if you want to see. If the court case was not on-going, I would have posted this up by now.

And this was the same agreement that your PH government did not want to honour and follow-up to get back the money. In fact, the PH government wanted to cancel the settlement agreement so that the 1MDB money continues to be classified as "missing" and not "due to be returned" under the agreement as no 1MDB money missing means Najib is not a thief.

Do you deny this?

5. You say my (PM 7) children were given Government contracts.

6. I did not even allow my children to do business in Malaysia, much less get Government contracts. They were not even given Government scholarships except Mirzan who got it before I became a member of Parliament in 1964. And Mirzan had to pay back 25%.

7. Only after I stepped down were they doing business in Malaysia – even then not with the Government. Certainly no Government contracts.

8. Please give documentary evidence of the contracts given to my children, just as documentary evidence proved that you as MO1 had taken money from 1MDB.

9. Please explain the sweetheart deals involving PM 7 cronies. Did Riza Aziz buy or did my children buy. And who are the cronies?

Oh? Your children never did any business in Malaysia while you were PM? And only after you stepped down that they started doing business?

Then was Mirzan your son when he built up Konsortium Perkapalan in the 1990s which eventually needed a bail-out from Petronas via MISC in the economic crisis of 1998?

MISC to Pay $220 Million Price For Assets From Mahathir's Son

Wasn't MISC and Petronas reporting to you as PM at that time?

Was Mirzan your son in the year 1996 and who was the PM then when Vincent Tan's brother Danny Tan sold Diperdana Corp to Mirzan just two years after Danny bought the company?

Diperdana Stake Is Sold in Deal Said to Be Tied to Mahathir's Son

Was Mohzani your son in 1997 and where you the PM in 1997 when he became the largest shareholder of the Hospital Pantai group after buying it from the Vincent Tan controlled Berjaya group?

Subsequently, the FOMEMA concessions and the governmetn hospitals supplies contract was awarded to that group while you were still PM.

Were you also PM when Mokhzani's Kencana group founded a year before was awarded a major fabrication (Offshore Structures) license by PETRONAS in the year 2002. Kencana Petroleum is one of only seven licensees in Malaysia awarded at that time.


Were you PM of Malaysia in 2002 and were you the advisor of Petronas even after you step down as PM in 2003 until 12 years later in the period where your son made billions from doing business with Petronas?

Were you also PM in the year 2003 where your son Mukhirz owned Opcom and the company was awarded a direct award without tender contract worth RM214 million by Telekom Malaysia on the direct instruction of the Ministry of Finance? (see attached letter).

This contract was instrumental to Opcom's successful listing later that year where another bundle was made.

Who was Minister of Finance and Prime Minister in 2003?

As for your second sting as PM, was it true that the RM21.6 bilion National Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan (NFCP) was the only mega-project rushed through and announced by the PH government and approved by cabinet in record time?

And was it true that Opcom shares jumped 50% upon the project being announced as it would be one of the main beneficiary of that project?

"Opcom rose 18.5 sen or 41.11% to 63.5 sen. Opcom's share price rise could be due to news that the Malaysian Cabinet had today approved the implementation of the National Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan (NFCP)

Who were the major shareholders and chairperson of Opcom then? Oh.. that's right. Two out of your three sons.

And can you deny that mere months before you retired as PM the first time in 2003, you gave a 20 year exclusive concession for sports and football betting to a Vincent Tan owned private company without tender and without cabinet approval?

This concession could potentially be worth tens of billions of Ringgit but the awarded company only had to pay a fee of only RM20 million.

"2004: A previously undisclosed license for a potentially lucrative Malaysian gambling concession granted to gaming tycoon Vincent Tan Chee Yioun by former Premier Mahathir Mohamad is stirring controversy within the country's government."

Gaming License Sparks Contention in Malaysia

So, don't talk about stealing or returning chickens. Under you, the entire hen-house was handed to the cronys to be slaughtered.

10. Incidentally, please explain why the great movie “The Wolf of Wall Street” had not been screened in Malaysia. Is it true that it is a pornographic film?

It is not a pornographic film. Yes, it has scenes of drug use and some nudity but it is not a pornographic film. It is rated "R" in the USA - the same as films like the Joker, Deadpool 1 and 2, The Matrix Reloaded, Ted, American Sniper, The Passion of the Christ, Saving Private Ryan and many others.

The Wolf of Wall Street is listed at number 39 in this list:

These are not the "X-rated" films that you think it is.

Incidentally, the Wolf of Wall street grossed US$392 million (RM1.68 bilion) in ticket sales world-wide with not a single dollar being Malaysian government contracts.

Other successful Riza produced films includes Dumb and Dumber To (US$170 million or RM727 million) and Daddy's Home (US$243 million or RM1.04 billion - both of which are shown in Malaysian cinemas.



dengar cerita jawapan najib ni dlm page mahathir dah kena delete..haha.. silap2 lepas ni anwar tag team dgn najib bagi lingkup terus legasi mahathir... maka bertempiaran pentaksub2 mahathir ambil borang masuk dap..
 
kira2 ni bukan le semata2 fitnah sbb dengki?
KamiBerdaddyKasi.jpg
 
NST Online
15m ·
#NSTnations According to Takiyuddin, the letter contains Thomas' minutes on Riza's letter of representation which was submitted by his lawyers



Takiyuddin unveils letter purporting to show ex-AG's agreement to Riza Aziz's settlement


August 10, 2020 @ 6:19pm

exag02_1597054736.jpg

Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law) Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan revealed that a written note by former Attorney-General Tan Sri Tommy Thomas shows that he had agreed, in principle, to film producer Riza Aziz’s terms of settlement. Photo by ASWADI ALIAS/NSTP

KUALA LUMPUR: Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law) Datuk Takiyuddin Hassan today revealed that a written note by former Attorney-General Tan Sri Tommy Thomas shows that he had agreed, in principle, to film producer Riza Aziz's terms of settlement.

This is in regard to Riza's money-laundering settlement of over US$248 million in funds linked to the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) scandal.

On May 14, the Sessions Court granted a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) to Riza.

According to Takiyuddin, the letter contains Thomas' minutes on Riza's letter of representation which was submitted by his lawyers.

"On Nov 19, 2019, Thomas had examined the letter of representation (from Riza's lawyers). After he examined the letter, Thomas, as the (then) AG, made a handwritten note, in red ink, on this letter.

"The note is to someone named Ram, whom I think everyone knows," he said, referring to the case's lead prosecutor, Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram.

"(Thomas) said to Ram: 'In light of the statements in paragraph 5.10, 5.14, 5.15, 5.18 and 5.19, I am prepared to consider this representation. Paragraph 5.20 contains the terms of the proposed settlements, I await your advice'.

"Signed by TT (Thomas), on Nov 19, with the Attorney-General's rubber stamp. In other words, the AG, in general, had agreed for Riza's case to be compounded and settled without being prosecuted. That is important," Takiyuddin said during his winding-up speech in the Dewan Rakyat today.

Riza Aziz is former Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak's step-son.

Furthermore, according to Takiyuddin, records show that Sri Ram held discussions with the then Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) chief Latheefa Koya, with the former suggesting that the MACC accept Riza's representation.

"Therefore, on March 11, Riza's solicitors sent another letter of representation fortifying the earlier proposal and undertook that Riza would comply with the terms and conditions.

"Subsequent to that, when Perikatan Nasional took over the government, and there was a change in the A-G, the new A-G was briefed by his deputy public prosecutors handling the case, and they informed him of the stance made by the previous A-G," he said.

Hanipa Maidin (PH-Sepang) then interjected, and accused Takiyuddin of misleading the Dewan Rakyat by drawing a conclusion on Thomas' brief note on the letter.

"To me, you cannot just draw a conclusion that Thomas agreed to the settlement. He said he was prepared, then he said he was waiting for advice from Sri Ram.

"To me, based on the letter, Sri Ram had to give advice but that doesn't mean he had to heed it, but you (Takiyuddin) say he had agreed. To me, that is misleading," he said.
Takiyuddin responded by reiterating his remark that Sri Ram had discussed the matter with Latheefa that the MACC accept the terms of the settlement.


https://www.nst.com.my/news/crime-c...JV3veCTPHs7QfaqzGxGmqQ5I3en6O88kL_BsUJTl2ER00
 
BERKENAAN PENDAKWAAN Di MAHKAMAH US DAN
PERJANJIAN YG DIFAILKAN DI MAHKAMAH US

Riza Aziz gugur tuntutan hartanah, aset AS$60 juta kes 1MDB




September 3, 2020 9:23 AM


Riza-Aziz-Court-050719-7.jpg

Penerbit Hollywood Riza Aziz dilepas tanpa dibebaskan oleh Mahkamah Sesyen Kuala Lumpur pada Mei.

PETALING JAYA: Penerbit Hollywood Riza Aziz menggugurkan tuntutan terhadap hartanah mewah dan aset lain bernilai AS$60 juta yang dirampas pihak berkuasa Amerika Syarikat (AS) pada 2016 dan 2017 sebagai sebahagian daripada siasatan skandal 1MDB.

Riza, 44, anak tiri bekas perdana menteri Najib Razak, berdepan 5 pertuduhan pengubahan wang haram membabitkan AS$248 juta di Malaysia, tetapi tuduhan itu digugurkan sebagai pertukaran pengembalian aset bernilai AS$107 juta.

Anak lelaki Rosmah Mansor itu dilepas tanpa dibebaskan oleh Mahkamah Sesyen Kuala Lumpur pada Mei.
Pendakwa raya AS percaya sekurang-kurangnya AS$4.5 bilion diseleweng daripada 1MDB dalam 1 skim yang diurus ahli perniagaan dalam buruan Low Taek Jho, yang lebih dikenali sebagai Jho Low.


Mereka berkata, dana itu digunakan untuk membeli hartanah mewah, kapal layar dan karya seni dan untuk mengadakan parti mewah.

Mengikut perjanjian difailkan di mahkamah di AS semalam, Riza mengugurkan tuntutan ke atas hartanah bernilai AS$60 juta dan aset lain, termasuk poster litograf untuk filem “Metropolis” 1927, lapor portal berita Variety.

Variety melaporkan Riza, pengasas bersama Red Granite Pictures dan penerbit “The Wolf of Wall Street”, menggugurkan tuntutan kepada 3 hartanah mewah – “Pyramid House” di Beverly Hills, sebuah kondominium di menara Park Laurel di Manhattan, dan kediaman di London.

Menurut laporan itu, beliau turut menggugurkan tuntutan berjumlah AS$28 juta dalam akaun bank Huntington National dan poster “Metropolis” itu.


Laporan itu menyebut aset yang dirampas termasuk hasil penjualan syarikat penyelenggaraan Kentucky yang mana Riza memiliki kepentingan.

Riza mengaku tidak melakukan sebarang kesalahan bawah perjanjian itu.

Variety turut menyebut, menurut mahkamah dana yang dirampas itu akan “digunakan untuk kepentingan rakyat Malaysia selepas pemotongan kos berkaitan kerajaan”.

Ia memetik pendakwa raya sebagai berkata kerajaan AS kini membantu dalam pemulihan sebanyak AS$ 1.1 bilion melalui aset 1MDB yang diseleweng.


 
BERKENAAN PENDAKWAAN Di MAHKAMAH US DAN
PERJANJIAN YG DIFAILKAN DI MAHKAMAH US

Malaysiakini (BM Version)
2m ·
DOJ mencapai penyelesaian dalam kes pelucutan sivil ke atas aset yang diperoleh oleh anak tiri Najib itu menggunakan dana yang dikatakan diseleweng daripada 1MDB.

1599104258014.png


DOJ dapatkan semula AS$ 60 juta dari Riza Aziz
Diterbitkan Hari ini 11:29 am

Dikemaskini Hari ini 11:32 am



Jabatan Keadilan (DOJ) Amerika Syarikat berjaya mendapatkan semula AS$60 juta (RM249 juta) setelah mencapai penyelesaian dalam kes pelucutan sivil ke atas aset yang diperoleh oleh Riza Aziz menggunakan dana yang dikatakan diseleweng daripada 1MDB.
Dana terbabit diperolehi daripada pengubahan wang haram menerusi institusi kewangan di Amerika Syarikat, Switzerland, Singapura dan Luxembourg.
“Aset-aset ini dianggarkan bernilai lebih AS$60 juta dan dengan penyelesaian ini, bersama dengan pelupusan kes-kes pelucutan berkaitan sebelum ini, AS telah mendapatkan atau membantu mendapatkan semula hampir AS$1.1 bilion (RM4.6 bilion) aset yang dikaitkan dengan rasuah dan pengubahan wang haram 1MDB,” kata DOJ dalam satu kenyataan.

Aset-aset yang dilucutkan dalam penyelesaian ini adalah tambahan kepada lebih AS$1 bilion aset yang sebelum ini disita berkaitan siasatan 1MDB oleh DOJ, yang dikatakan terbesar setakat ini di bawah Inisiatif Pemulihan Aset Kleptokrasi.

“Seperti dakwaan di dalam aduan pelucutan itu, Riza Aziz dan lain-lain, secara bersama telah mengubah secara haram berbilion dolar yang dicuri daripada 1MDB, satu dana pelaburan yang bertujuan untuk memberi manfaat kepada rakyat Malaysia,” kata pemangku penolong peguam negara AS, Brian C Rabbitt dari Jabatan Jenayah DOJ.

“(Riza) Aziz dan rakan komplotnya dikatakan mengalihkan dana ini untuk kepentingan peribadi mereka dan menggunakannya untuk memperoleh hartanah mewah di New York dan London dan membuat pelaburan peribadi.

“Pelucutan aset-aset ini akan menjadi tambahan kepada hampir AS$1.1bilion yang dicuri dari 1MDB, yang telah DOJ AS bantu untuk dapatkan semula setakat ini dan dipulangkan kepada rakyat Malaysia,” tambah Rabbitt.
“Pelucutan ini memberikan isyarat jelas bahawa jabatan ini tidak akan membenarkan penjenayah mempergunakan sistem kewangan AS untuk mengubah hasil aktiviti haram mereka”.

e8d9618eb745bd859db471b77aefcc10.jpg

Tindakan undang-undang diteruskan

Peguam AS Nick Hanna dari Central District of California berkata tindakan undang-undang akan diteruskan bagi merungkai skim pengubahan wang haram dan penyelewengan besar-besaran yang mencuri dana awam milik Malaysia itu.
“Hartanah mewah yang telah dirampas dan dilucutkan di seluruh negara menunjukkan komitmen kami untuk menghalang pelaku korup daripada mempergunakan AS sebagai tempat menyembunyikan kekayaan yang dicuri,” kata Hana.
Pada Mei, Riza, anak tiri bekas perdana menteri Najib Razak, dilepas tanpa dibebaskan (DNAA) oleh Mahkamah Sesyen Kuala Lumpur untuk lima pertuduhan jenayah kerana didakwa menerima hasil haram daripada dana 1MDB.
Penerbit ‘The Wolf of Wall Street’ dan ‘Dumb and Dumber To’ itu didakwa tahun lalu di Malaysia kerana dituduh menerima sejumlah AS$248 juta (RM1 bilion) antara 2011 dan 2012.
Riza dituduh melakukan kesalahan itu dengan menerima wang menerusi akaun bank Red Granite, syarikat penerbitan Hollywood yang dia asaskan bersama.
Pelepasan itu bagaimanapun bergantung pada pematuhannya terhadap persetujuan yang dicapai dengan pihak pendakwaan, antara lain, memulangkan anggaran AS$107.3 juta (RM465.3 juta) kepada kerajaan Malaysia.
Najib sendiri dihukum bersalah atas tujuh dakwaan salah guna kuasa, pecah amanah dan pengubahan wang haram berkaitan skandal itu dan dihukum 12 tahun penjara dan denda RM210 juta.

2f971a43582e59027d90e227e88fac9a.jpg

Najib yang sedang menunggu proses rayuan berhubung keputusan berkenaan, kini berdepan lebih banyak tuduhan berkaitan 1MDB.

‘Skim keji’
Penolong Pengarah Bahagian Penyiasatan Jenayah FBI Calvin Shivers berkata kes di AS itu menunjukkan usaha siasatan yang “signifikan” oleh Pasukan Korupsi Antarabangsa FBI dan rakan-rakannya.
“Riza dan rakan komplotnya menyeleweng dan melakukan pengubahan wang haram berbilion dolar daripada rakyat Malaysia untuk kepentingan peribadi mereka, dan mereka tidak akan dibiarkan mendapat keuntungan (daripada perbuatan itu).
“FBI komited untuk membawa semua yang terlibat dalam skim keji ini ke muka pengadilan dan membuat mereka bertanggungjawab atas perbuatan haram itu,” katanya.

c61d5eda372b1f8e1c3d0cca5af86c50.jpg

Berdasarkan aduan pelucutan sivil itu, dari 2009 hingga 2015, lebih AS$4.5 bilion dana milik 1MDB dikatakan telah diseleweng oleh pegawai tinggi 1MDB serta rakan mereka melalui pengubahaan wang haram menerusi institusi kewangan di bawah bidang kuasa pegawai awam Malaysia dan rakan-rakan mereka, termasuk Aziz.

Di bawah terma penyelesaian itu, penuntut dalam tindakan pelucutan AS bersetuju melucutkan semua aset, bergantung kepada aduan pelucutan yang masih berjalan yang mana mereka mempunyai potensi kepentingan.

Penuntut turut dikehendaki bekerjasama dan membantu DOJ dalam pemindahan, pengurusan dan pelupusan aset-aset yang berkaitan.
Aset yang tertakluk kepada persetujuan penyelesaian itu termasuklah hasil jualan sebuah hartanah mewah di Beverly Hills serta satu kondominium mewah di New York; hasil jualan pelaburan oleh Riza di sebuah syarikat penyelenggaraan di Kentucky; sebuah rumah bandar mewah di London; dan poster promosi untuk filem motion picture ‘Metropolis’ pada tahun 1927.


 
Back
Top
Log in Register