Debate Nak percaya kpd apa? Nak percaya kpd siapa?

[konaLeper]

The US kidnapping of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro wasn’t just an attack on Venezuela. It was also an attack on America.

The United States of America is not a “deep” organic nation featuring people who have lived there for many centuries under gradually-evolving cultural traditions, including language and religion. It emerged only 250 years ago as an idea, and that idea is enshrined in the Constitution, whose main function is to prevent autocratic, tyrannical rule. To that end, the president cannot make law, only execute it. He cannot declare war, only command it.

sumber

 

[konaLeper]

sumner

 

[konaLeper]

A global review examining reported cases of cancer following Covid vaccination was published earlier this month, just as the medical journal hosting it was hit by a cyberattack that has since taken the site offline.

The study appeared in the peer-reviewed journal Oncotarget on January 3 and was authored by cancer researchers from Tufts University in Boston and Brown University in Rhode Island.

In the review, researchers analyzed 69 previously published studies and case reports from around the world, identifying 333 instances in which cancer was newly diagnosed or rapidly worsened within a few weeks following Covid vaccination.

Spoiler

The review covered studies from 2020 to 2025 and included reports from 27 countries, including the US, Japan, China, Italy, Spain, and South Korea. No single country dominated, suggesting the observed patterns were reported globally.

The authors emphasized that the review highlights patterns observed in existing reports, but does not establish a direct causal link between vaccination and cancer.

Days after publication, Oncotarget's website became inaccessible, displaying a 'bad gateway' error that the journal attributed to an ongoing cyberattack.

The journal reported the incident to the FBI, noting disruptions to its online operations.

In social media posts, one of the paper's authors, Dr Wafik El-Deiry of Brown University, expressed concern that the attack disrupted access to newly published research.

'Censorship is alive and well in the US, and it has come into medicine in a big, awful way,' El-Deiry wrote in a post on X.

sumber

 

[konaLeper]

batal balik katanya ...(or even revoke emergency approvals).

What started as a quiet January 3, 2026, publication exploded after the journal’s site was hit by a reported cyberattack, taking it offline. The attempted blackout backfired. Instead of burying the findings, the cyberattack turned them into a global news event.

People shared links, PDFs, and discussions everywhere. The more the journal struggled to stay online amid the cyberattack, the louder the story became. This must be causing real unease in Big Pharma and vaccine industry circles. Meanwhile, the smearing campaign against Dr. Wafik El-Deiry, one of the paper’s authors, continues unabated.

Spoiler: Pfizer attempts to hire Dr Wafik El-Deiry

The situation grows stranger. Days after the paper was published, Pfizer reached out to recruit El-Deiry. A headhunter praised his expertise in oncologic sciences, highlighted his leadership roles, and floated senior positions at the company. El-Deiry shared the full message publicly and rejected it outright: “It is ironic to get a message from a Pfizer recruiter on January 5, 2026. However, I am not interested in moving to a role at Pfizer.”

sumber

 

[konaLeper]

In a lawsuit filed today in federal court, Children’s Health Defense (CHD) and five other plaintiffs accused the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) of running a decades-long racketeering scheme to defraud American families about the safety of the childhood vaccine schedule.

The suit alleges that the AAP violated the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) by making “false and fraudulent” claims about the safety of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) childhood immunization schedule — while receiving funding from vaccine manufacturers and providing financial incentives to pediatricians who achieve high vaccination rates.

“For too long, the AAP has been held up on a pedestal, as if it were a font of science and integrity,” said CHD CEO Mary Holland. “Sadly, that’s not the case.”

Instead, Holland said, the AAP “is a front operation in a racketeering scheme involving Big Pharma, Big Medicine and Big Media, ready at every turn to put profits above children’s health. It’s time to face facts and see what the AAP is really about,” Holland said.


sumber

 

[konaLeper]

U.S. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. told USA Today that the wireless radiation from cellphones, cell towers and other wireless infrastructure is a “major health concern.”

Kennedy spoke with USA Today on Jan. 16, one day after the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) launched a new study into the health effects of cellphone radiation — a step that advocates say could reflect a major shift in federal policy.

The same day HHS launched the study, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration under Kennedy’s direction scrubbed old webpages stating that cellphones aren’t dangerous.

Kennedy said he was “very concerned” about the negative health impacts of electromagnetic radiation (EMR), a term that encompasses both radiofrequency (RF) radiation and electromagnetic fields (EMFs).

According to Kennedy, there are “literally over 10,000 studies” on EMR documenting “ill effects, including cancer tumor growth.”

sumber

 

[konaLeper]

............

sumber

 

[konaLeper]

sumber

 

[konaLeper]

 

[konaLeper]

The BMJ last week published an op-ed urging the public health community to engage the so-called anti-vaccine groups — like Children’s Health Defense (CHD) — without “capitulating to misinformation,” as the author alleged CHD has done.

These groups who “mistrust science” have moved “from the fringe into the mainstream,” and are now “politically empowered,” the Commonwealth Fund’s Lucinda Hiam wrote. Rather than dismissing the groups outright, conventional public health must engage with them, she wrote.

However, contrary to her own advice, Hiam did not engage directly with CHD, which she disparaged in her op-ed. She also didn’t engage with scientists and doctors who have questioned the “all vaccines are safe and effective” narrative.

CHD CEO Mary Holland said in a response letter submitted to The BMJ that she “couldn’t agree more” with Hiam’s argument that public health must “bridge the divide with groups who mistrust science.”

“But my question is, does science require trust? I thought real science required proof, not trust,” Holland said. “We at CHD see ourselves as ferociously pro-science and pro-proof; we don’t ‘trust’ science; we seek to do science based on evidence. We are as much a science-based organization as one engaged in advocacy.”

Holland invited Hiam to debate.

“I extend my sincere invitation to Ms. Hiam; if she is prepared to have a civil, open-minded conversation about the true risks and benefits of vaccination and inaccurate information about vaccines, I would be delighted to host it on CHD.TV and any other platform of her choosing. Let’s bridge that divide!”

sumber