BTC USD 81,576.8 Gold USD 4,088.20
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

Konspirasi Arab Terhadap Islam

aku pun konpius ngan TT, ada dia guna ayat Al-Quran untuk menyiakan kebenarannya, pada masa yang sama dia guna ayat tu untuk menafikan.
kalau dah kata ayat Al-Quran yang ada tu tak betol, buat apa menyia & menafikan.
Sesiapa yang menafikan ayat kebenaran ayat Al-Quran maka dia kufur.
Tak kiralah sama ada bagi pandangan peribadi atau pandangan berdasarkan saintifik.
tolong cerita sikit apa motif?

p/s aku pun heran ada orang yang 'thanks' utk tt. istighfar bebanyak.
 
hati2 dengan agen yahudi dan dajjal laknatulkah ini...............
 
aku pun konpius ngan TT, ada dia guna ayat Al-Quran untuk menyiakan kebenarannya, pada masa yang sama dia guna ayat tu untuk menafikan.
kalau dah kata ayat Al-Quran yang ada tu tak betol, buat apa menyia & menafikan.
Sesiapa yang menafikan ayat kebenaran ayat Al-Quran maka dia kufur.
Tak kiralah sama ada bagi pandangan peribadi atau pandangan berdasarkan saintifik.
tolong cerita sikit apa motif?

p/s aku pun heran ada orang yang 'thanks' utk tt. istighfar bebanyak.

aku pun terpikir,diorang yg taruk thanks tue letak membuta tuli atau pun fahaman sama ngan TT
 
kalau Kaabah itu petunjuk(qiblah) kenapa Masjidil Haram dan bukan kaabah yg diterangkan di AQ?
tanya kepada ulamak di universiti mana sekalipun, bila masjidil haram dibinakan??
sebelum atau sesudah kewafatan nabi??
atau kau sendiri pun blh google utk dapatkan jawapannya

kalau itu betul tempat Ibrahim, Adam dan isterinya kenapa tempat itu langsung tidak dikatakan di torah dan injil??
dan kenapa pengikut Isa/Musa yg semua juga pengikut Nabi Ibrahim tidak dibenarkan ketempat itu??

satu lagi, antara cara syirik yg halus adalah dari segi tulisan
bila Rasul Allah dijadikan Rasulullah (disatukan dgn Tuhan)

itu pun tak tahu , nampak benor bahasa arabnya kelaut ...... gi tanya budak darjah 1 ... :eek: :eek: :))
 
admin forum carigold ni islam ke?

kenapa dibiarkan thread sesat camni?

sori kalau kasar bahasa..
 
deleted...........
 
Last edited:
itu pun tak tahu , nampak benor bahasa arabnya kelaut ...... gi tanya budak darjah 1 ... :eek: :eek: :))

tu la yg aku heran dgn puak2 ni,bahasa arab kelaut,hanya tau ana anta,sembang cam 16 tahun belajar di mekah.setakat baca terjemahan pastu buat kesimpulan pakai otak udang diorg tok nyang aku bleh.... :))
 
aku pun terpikir,diorang yg taruk thanks tue letak membuta tuli atau pun fahaman sama ngan TT

dua2 kot.
kita jangan jadi macam orang Kristian & Yahudi, buat kitab sendiri kemudian tafsir sendiri dengan suka hatinya.
Dalam Islam (ASWJ) yang mentafsirkan Al Quran adalah authority alim ulama yang arif dalam bidang tafsir yang tiada kecenderungan mana-mana pihak.
 
Yo tamby dol dey... Weil! Weil!
Lagik... Weil! Weil!

The Actual Site of Baca/Bakkah

It is unanimously accepted that the original word in the Hebrew Bible is ‘Baca’. The context clearly indicates that it has been used as a proper noun and most of the versions and translations of the Bible have retained this status. Some of the translations and versions have misconceived its status and have taken it to be a common word. Then they tried to translate it whimsically as: weeping, tears, balsam tree, mulberry, some of the other trees, dry valley, etc. It does not seem to be a proper approach and is based on some misunderstanding.

The Hebrew word ‘Baca’ is composed of three alphabetical letters = בכא(b→k→a). According to the Strong’s Dic. of the Heb. Bible it means: ‘weeping’[1] or ‘the weeping tree (some gum-distilling tree, perhaps the balsam,):—mulberry tree.’. ‘Bakah’ is also composed of three alphabetical letters = בכה(b→k→h), meaning ‘to weep; gen. to bemoan, to bewail, complain, mourn, with tears, weep’.

The vowel symbols had not been introduced in the Hebrew writing system until the seventh/eighth century AD.[4] It was only after their introduction in the Qur’ān in the 7th century AD that some proper vocalization system for the Bible was developed somewhere in the beginning of the seventh century. Before the introduction of the vocalization system in Hebrew writing, the words ‘Baca’ and ‘Bacca’; or the words ‘Bakah’ and ‘Bakkah’ were to be written in the same way. King David had actually and naturally used the word ‘Bakkah’ in his Psalm. Because the words ‘Bakah’ and ‘Bakkah’ were written in the Hebrew script in the same way, it got the pronunciation of ‘Baca’ or ‘Bakah’ instead of the correct pronunciation of ‘Bakkah’ in the later Jewish ages. This ‘Bakkah’ was the ancient name of ‘Makkah’ and was given to it by Abraham. Originally the city was called by this name. Here are some of the Arab authorities to elaborate it:

‘Lisān al-‘Arab’ (the language of the ‘Arabs), a renowned Arabic Dictionary in 18 volumes, explains: Ya’qūb says, ‘Bakkah is what is situated in between the two mountains of Makkah, because the people crushed one another during the circumambulation or overcrowded there. (…). It is said that Bakkah is the name of the interior of Makkah and it was given this name due to the crowding and swarming of the people. The tradition of Mujāhid states, ‘Bakkah is among the names of Makkah.’ And it is said, ‘Bakkah is the site of the House of the Lord, and Makkah is the whole of the city.’ It is also said, ‘Both [Makkah and Bakkah] are the names of the city; and [the alphabetical letters] “B” and “M” succeed (can replace) one another.’
 
Back
Top
Log in Register