BTC USD 83,430.2 Gold USD 4,161.17
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

[WTA] engineer vs technician

salam,

aku adalah bekas engineer(dalam bidang mechanical - manufacturing), dekat 2-3 taun je la..nak kata pengalaman banyak sangat tu tidak la..ciput je..

tapi ada sikit yg aku bleh share..

dulu masa kerja, hari-hari penuh dengan cabaran,hari-hari banyak kes politik kat kilang, dan agak rasa best pasal ko dipandang macam seorang bos oleh operator-operator dan technician, tapi operator-operator kadang2 berbulu dengan ko pasal ko keje dalam aircond dan nampak macam kerja duduk je (padahal diorang tak tau kita ni duk pecah kepala nak structure workability diorang)

dan nak naik pangkat memang terasa susah pasal ko kena betul2 excellent, dan pengalaman memang sangat-sangat diperlukan instead of knowledge alone, pasal tu susah nak jumpa bos yg muda melainkan company tu bapak dia yg punya

Masa kerja tak boleh baik dan jujur sangat nanti kita senang kena guna-guna oleh superior (lebih-lebih lagi company yg ramai cha ya nun alif)

skang aku dah bertukar ke bidang IT, taktau kenapa tapi company IT ni lebih appreciate pekerja dia,especially yang dari background engineering (pasal ada sorang bos ni kata engineers ada advance logical thinking and analytical skill)..

apa maksud aku "company IT lebih appreciate pekerja dia"? , maksudnya diorang bagi salary lebih baik dari engineering, tengok tempat jugak la..kalau macam kat cyberjaya ni memang betul gaji semua outstanding..
 
Last edited:
apa yg aku nk smpikan kt sini adalah...knowledge is the key here...whether you as techinican or engineer...cuma...engineer has more exposure compare to technician...tp ada jugak half dr engineer yg thinking cam technician, dia x kan success...and ada jugak few technican yg pikir cam eng, tp susah jugak nk success...sbb...walaupun in realiti..praktikal mmg penting...tp for you to grow...theory is more important...bila you jd engineer..expected you completed your degree dgn benda merapu yg you think x guna masa kerja (kononnya)....well...aku guna skang calculation yg aku ingat merapu masa U dulu...so..go for knowledge....

apa maksud bro yg aku boldkan tue?
 
apa maksud bro yg aku boldkan tue?

maksud aku attitude...sepatutnya engineer...solve root cause...kena paham every action kita buat..mesti ada reaction...you tweak something...still fail...so..you kena paham sbb apa fail...klu pass...still kena paham sbb apa pass...why apa yg kita tweak tu give good result...secara ringkas engineer kena paham why its happen....tp ada engineer yg just make sure benda tu pass...but why it pass..x peduli..klu fail next time...nnt pikir...so..ini cam techncian punya thinking (and this kind of thinking acceptable for technician...sbb technician job just make sure problem fix)...

and ada techinician yg nak paham smpi root cause..tp x paham2...sbb sometimes...it takes degree knowledge utk paham sesetengah benda...this kind of attitude is good...tp aku rasa...technician yg who has this kind of attitude kena further study sbb ia buleh bwk to somewhere yg lebih tinggi...
 
maksud aku attitude...sepatutnya engineer...solve root cause...kena paham every action kita buat..mesti ada reaction...you tweak something...still fail...so..you kena paham sbb apa fail...klu pass...still kena paham sbb apa pass...why apa yg kita tweak tu give good result...secara ringkas engineer kena paham why its happen....tp ada engineer yg just make sure benda tu pass...but why it pass..x peduli..klu fail next time...nnt pikir...so..ini cam techncian punya thinking (and this kind of thinking acceptable for technician...sbb technician job just make sure problem fix)...

and ada techinician yg nak paham smpi root cause..tp x paham2...sbb sometimes...it takes degree knowledge utk paham sesetengah benda...this kind of attitude is good...tp aku rasa...technician yg who has this kind of attitude kena further study sbb ia buleh bwk to somewhere yg lebih tinggi...

trima kasih,ada btulnya apa bro tulis tue.
 
Back
Top
Log in Register