arin_gis
Active+ Member
- Messages
- 4,931
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2006
- Messages
- 4,931
- Reaction score
- 112
- Points
- 33
In the year of our Lord eighteen ninety and two
John Houlding evicted the blues
From their Anfield abode on the Walton Breck Road
He was tired of seeing them lose
Year's behind in rent all their money was spent
A bank that held nothing but zeros
But Houlding instead built a team dressed in red
Liverpool his Anfield heroes
John Houlding (to the tune of Irish Rover)
Brewer John Houlding was instrumental in renting a new land for Everton to play on between Anfield Road and Walton Breck Road on which Everton made their debut on 28 September 1884. Everton’s new home simply became known as Anfield after the district it was situated in. Joseph Orrell Jr., who inherited the land from his father in 1883, put it up for sale in 1885. Houlding bought Anfield from Joseph for 5,228 pounds, 11 shillings, 11 pence, to be precise, which including legal costs, amounted to a total of £6,000. Houlding used £2,000 of his own money to purchase the ground and took a £4,000 mortgage on which he paid 3% interest. The contract stipulated that Houlding should make a yearly donation to Stanley Hospital in the name of Orrell and that the land on the perimeter of the Anfield ground that Joseph’s uncle, brewer John Orrell, owned should be left alone in case of a future construction of an access road that Houlding should partake in building. This contractual clause later played a big role in the split
between Houlding and Everton.
Meeting 12th of October 1891 in the lecture hall of the College at Shaw street.
The chairman of Everton FC's meeting read a letter from Houlding: "Mr John Orrell has given me notice that he intends to exercise his right to make the road on the north side of the football field, one half, namely, 18 feet of the breadth, of which must be constructed out of my land, and one half out of his. The enclosure and stands, which have been erected, on sufferance, by private subscription, extend over the 18 feet contributed by me, and I am required by Mr. Orrell to remove them forthwith. Under these circumstances, it is with extreme regret that I am obliged to give you notice, which I hereby do, that you must give up possession of the piece of land, situated between Anfield-road and Walton Breck-road, used as a football ground, with the approaches thereto, after the closing of the present season, namely on the 30th of April, 1892."
Houlding's letter to Everton's committee (click for a larger image)
Mr. George Mahon and his followers thought it was unacceptable for Everton to pay a total of £370 a year to keep on playing at Anfield and have a training ground on Orrell's land. Mahon announced he had got a reasonable offer of a more suitable piece of land, Mere Green, at Goodison-road for £50 rent per year. He further instructed that "a special committee be appointed to inquire into the whole matter of the ground, the terms on which the present ground [Houlding's] and the adjoining field [Orrell's] can be rented or purchased, and also the terms on which new grounds [Goodison-road] can be obtained."
George Mahon was Everton's leader when they split from John Houlding
Mahon was a senior partner in accountant firm: Roose, Mahon & Howard and the organist at St Domingo's church. Mahon along with Reverand B.S. Chambers formed a football team in 1878 for the church's cricket team to be active during the winter months. The team that started life as St. Domingo's became Everton in 1879.
Meeting 15th of October 1891.
Everton had been paying £250 a year for Houlding's Anfield for three and a half years, but they were now forced by circumstances to pay an extra £120 a year to Orrell for the rent of his adjoining ground. A proposal was put forth by Houlding to form the Everton Club into a limited liability company in order to raise capital to purchase his Anfield ground and Orrell's land. Mr. Clayton held a long speech opposing the idea and "evident from the reception he received at the end of his remarks that he had the sympathy of the meeting." At the end of the meeting this scheme was rejected.
Meeting 25th of January 1892 in the College, Shaw street.
Clayton said that he was opposed to buying Houlding's ground as he felt it was overpriced. Clayton had consulted a land agent who said that the land was only worth 4s. 6d. per yard, not 7s. 6d. which he claimed was "ridiculous". This would mean they would have to raise £10,000-12,000 considering the relatively small capital they could raise hence a big mortgage.
Houlding had already explained in detail his outlay in the purchase of the land and the interest he had received from year to year. £250 a year was a fair amount since he had paid £5,400 for the ground (Houlding acknowledged at the general meeting two months later that he paid £5,228 for Anfield) and plus legal costs he felt he was entitled 4% interest. Houlding said that his total outlay at the time had been £6,000. Reportedly he had been paying 3% interest on the £4,000 mortgage he took to purchase the ground.
Houlding £250 - Everton £180
Clayton argued that if they would take into account the amount paid by Houlding for Anfield which was £5,400, 4% of that would only amount to to £216. Furthermore that had been paid for the actual playing ground and the frontage of the ground which was "a vacant land used for the purpose of persons going to and from the entrance gates", as Houlding himself described it. Clayton felt it was unfair to pay 4% interest on the frontage that Everton did not use. (This remark was followed by big applause). If they took the value of the frontage at 7s. 6d. it would be worth £900. If they would pay 4% interest as suggested by Houlding on the £4,500 he paid for the playing ground as such, that would mean a rent of £180 per year.
Consequently Clayton proposed: "That we offer Mr. Houlding £180 per annum for the ground used by Everton Football Club on lease for 10 years; rent to be paid quarterly in advance. The tenants to have the option of purchase of the land @ 7/6 per yard, such purchase to be arranged between now and April 30th, 94."
Mr. John McKenna who spoke on Houlding's behalf at the meeting was not well pleased and reiterated that they had heard time after time that Houlding would not accept £180 and not alter his conditions one iota. McKenna also stated that he felt personal animosity towards Houlding was behind this proposition (which met with cries of "No, no" and "Withdraw" from the meeting). Clayton called McKenna an "irresponsible official".
Mahon put forth a proposition that Everton should rent the Goodison-road site for £50 a year as Houlding was not going to compromise. That was agreed by a large majority, but Houlding was given seven days to lower the rent from £250 to £180. Clayton proposed a limited liability company should be formed, to prevent any future loss having too much effect on each of Everton's members. Everton's vice-chairman Mr. W.E. Barclay, who had chaired the meeting, was very unhappy with the result and tended his resignation four days later.
John McKenna
As had been decided Everton FC's committee sent a registration for its own limited liability company with a capital of £500. However, the club's registration was temporarily rejected as Houlding had registered his own company in Somerset House with a very similar name to Everton Football Club: "The Everton Football Club and Athletic Grounds Company, Limited" just 24 hours previously, the day after the meeting at the College, on 26th of January. Two companies could not share the Everton name. The gloves were now officially off!
Images of the provisional prospectus of Houlding's new company
Houlding stated in the prospectus that "This company had been formed for the purpose of carrying on a Football and Athletic club in all its branches, and for acquiring the valuable freehold property known as the EVERTON FOOTBALL GROUND, containing about 13,600 square yards of land, and also about 9,700 square yards of freehold land adjoining to the North and West, owned by Mr. John Orrell, which it is acknowledged will together make one of the finest Football Grounds in the United Kingdom.
The addition of Mr. Orrell's ground will enable the company to add cycling and running tracks, as that the Company's ground can be used for Athletics Sports all year round. The vendors, Mr. John Houlding and Mr. John Orrell have agreed to sell their land, Mr. Houlding's containing about 13,600 yards, and Mr. Orrell's about 9,700, together 23,300 yards at 7/6 per yard - £8,737 10s."
A cartoon in Liverpool Review in 1892 highlighted King John's fall from grace at Everton.
The text beneath the picture says: Moral - A "King" may be knocked down in various ways.
If we were a "King" we would prefer the blow came from another than a football quarter.
Meeting 8th of March 1892.
A general meeting was announced by Everton FC for 15th of March. Everton FC also announced an agreement of Houlding's request a copy of the prospectus of his new company, Everton Football Club and Athletic Grounds Company, Limited was to be sent to each member along with the notice convening the meeting.
Meeting 15th of March 1892 - Presbyterian schools in Royal-street.
Houlding and Everton finally parted ways at Everton's general meeting. Requisition 1-1 stated the following: "That Messrs John Houlding, Alexander Nisbet and Thomas C. Howarth having lost the confidence of the members of the club, be respectively removed from the presidency and the committee."
Everton FC also had to address Houlding's attempted takeover of the club announced in his prospectus from 26th of January which is here quoted: "The Company propose that in the event of Everton Football Club agreeing to amalgamate with the company, on or before the 15th of March 1892, each members of the said club at the date of such amalgamation (in the whole not exceeding 500 members) shall be entitled upon application to have allotted to him one fully paid up share in the company free of charge."
Chairman George Mahon occupied the president’s chair at the meeting, but: "As the proceedings were about to begin, Mr John Houlding, the president, entered the room and was vociferously cheered by a section of the members. The Chairman, seeing that their president was present, thought he himself ought to occupy the position of an ordinary committeeman, and to ask him to take the chair.
Mr. Houlding. – "I cannot hear."
The Chairman. – "I have asked you, as president of the club, to take the chair (cheers)."
Mr. Houlding. – "I am here on trial, and a criminal never takes the chair, he stops in the dock [A voice cries out: ‘Best place for him!’]"
The Chairman remarked that, seeing Mr. Houlding had declined to take the chair, it was his duty to fill that position (cheers)."
Mahon said he was aghast to discover that two members of Everton FC's committee, Mr. Ramsey and Mr. Nisbet had been party to founding Houlding's new company. He also stated that the League had ruled in Everton FC's favour and forbid Houlding to use the word Everton in his new company's title "which practically knocked the new company on the head (loud applause)."
Regarding the amalgamation Mahon ridiculed Houlding's promise that each member "shall be entitled upon application to have allotted to him one fully paid up share in the company free of charge." He said that the members "should be entitled to at least seven or eight shares (Hear, hear and applause)."
Clayton rose (amid loud applause) to propose requisition 1-1 that Houlding, Nisbet and Howarth should be shown the door. He said that he did not propose this "from spite and spleen" (Oh, oh and applause). It was simply "a matter of business". Houlding was not "worthy of holding the position of president of this club" (Loud applause and hooting).
Mr. Martin was appalled and claimed there would be no Everton Football Club had it not been for Houlding (applause). Nisbet said he did not agree with this course of action and was resigning.
The chairman. - "You are not in order in doing so (applause)."
Mr. Nisbet. - "I don't accept your ruling. I resign (laughter and applause)."
Houlding then addressed the gathering to explain his side of the matter. He clearly felt he had been unfairly treated. Houlding claimed that when he received Orrell's notice he had brought a prospectus before Everton's committee that the club form a company and buy the ground, as he didn't want the liability of buying another ten thousand yards of land to replace Anfield. He said it was well received by the committee, yet at the general meeting in May 1891, some committee members, who had previously agreed with his propositions, had turned against him and the majority voted against the company.
Houlding was done for at Everton FC. Of the 500 present, only 18 voted in his favour. A decision had been made to split from Houlding and Anfield altogether and go to Goodison-road.
It should be noted that the rift between Houlding and Everton can also be traced to the Methodists who had been associated with the club since it was essentially the Sunday school team for St Domingo's church in the district of Everton. They disliked immensely the fact that Houlding's empire was based on alcoholic beverages. The Methodists would have undoubtedly liked to put Houlding in Prince Rupert's Tower, which was used to incarcerate criminals and is so prominent in the current Everton FC crest.
This whole sorry matter was discussed in the 19th of March 1892 issue of the Liverpool Echo. The writer was clearly not sympathetic towards Houlding starting by praising Mahon and his followers for getting rid of Houlding who he claims was essentially a "One man government" at Everton FC. "To submit Mr Houlding to such ungracious and ungenerous conduct at a public meeting might appear an outrage to some people, but when the two sides of the matter have been impartially dealt with the question might be asked, has Mr Houlding not invited it by his own dogmatic and not too courteous conduct towards the club and the committee! Did he invest his capital in the sell out of Anfield road in a purely philanthropic sense. Or as a speculation? Events unmistakeably point to the latter, for he will not give 1/2 p abatement from the highest rent he can place upon it."
"The fact is Mr Houlding had come to look upon the Everton club as his own property, to do with just as he pleased, and up to within a couple of years he presided over a committee who only looked through spectacles of his own making and he accordingly "Ruled the roost". Now a few practical men, with a capacity for "business" equal to Mr Houlding, have found their way onto the executive and declined to be either led by the nose or patronised. Mr Houlding is not the man to die tamely, as his opponents discovered over registration of his pet athletic company. As landlord of the ground, he declined to meet them on any but his own terms. But in this respect he has shown inconsistent and dogmatic spirit. First, he tells the committee that his own and Mr Orrell's properties adjacent is required for building purposes, but that the club might continue its tenancy if they will pay the rent demanded. This the committee declined as exorbitant and out of all reason. "Very well", says Mr Houlding. "You must look for another site", "here is the notice to quit my ground", thinking, no doubt, that will bring the body of "Independents" on the committee to their senses. Some of the gentlemen would have taken their shirts off their backs and given them to Mr Houlding if he had asked for them, but these did not include Messrs. Mahon and Clayton and those of the others who could afford to act differently. Instead of grouching they acquitted the proposition thrust upon them manfully."
Meeting 30th of March 1892 - Neptune hotel in Clayton Square.
Houlding had a big stadium, but no team and decided to create his own team to rival Everton FC. On 30th of March, the rules of the newly-formed club were approved by its committee, rule 1 stating: "That the club be called the Liverpool Football Club and shall play under the rules of the Football Association." Houlding was president of the club, Edwin Berry chairman, William E. Barclay secretary and John McKenna was alongside Barclay in charge of team affairs.
Some felt Houlding was harshly treated by Everton considering his financial muscle enabled Everton's success as seen in The Athletic and Dramatic News from 5th of April 1892 hoping for Liverpool's success: "Personally we should much like to see the new combination boom, if only to prove to Mr Houlding that, although he has been, all things considered badly treated by his colleagues, the football loving public of Liverpool have not forgotten his great services in the cause of their pastime."
A document confirming Houlding's new name of his company on 3rd of June 1892.
John Houlding was forced to change the name of his new company, "Everton Football Club and Athletic Grounds Company, Limited" to "Liverpool Football Club and Athletic Grounds Company, Limited", as the Football Association didn't agree with having two Everton football clubs.
The first game at Anfield under Houlding's presidency was a friendly against Midland League side Rotherham Town on 1st of September 1892. Houlding was praised for his efforts in the match programme: "To know him is to like him, though there are some who are hostile to him, because they never tried to know him. He is a man of energy, determination, and honesty of purpose, and under his presidency the Liverpool Club is sure to prosper, the same way the Everton Club did."
Last edited:
