BTC USD 81,268.8 Gold USD 4,165.56
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

Konspirasi Arab Terhadap Islam

bukan keraguan, baca dan fahamkan, fikirkan, nilai sendiri,munajat
mintak petunjuk jalan benar.

TT dh buat munajat la ni..
Apa kesimpulannya...

Kesemua org arab menipu dlm terjemahan alquran...

Mcm tu ke...
 
TT dh buat munajat la ni..
Apa kesimpulannya...

Kesemua org arab menipu dlm terjemahan alquran...

Mcm tu ke...

logik, pernah dengar tak, orang mekah sendiri tak mengerjakan haji.
 
logik, pernah dengar tak, orang mekah sendiri tak mengerjakan haji.

Aku x tanya pasal logik tu. Aku tanya TT dh buat munajat ke belum..
Btw, buat haji tu sekali je yg wajib...
Logik x klu org yg TT maksudkn tu dh pernah buat haji...
 
logik, pernah dengar tak, orang mekah sendiri tak mengerjakan haji.

Orang yang mengerjakan Haji adalah tetamu Allah yang dijemput khas. Bukan pasal dia duduk kat mekah mesti dia mengerjakan haji. Kena faham dulu konsep tetamu Allah ni.

Bila dikatakan tetamu maka Allah yang menjemput dan mendorong mereka supaya datang menunaikan Ibadah yang telah ditetapkan.

Haji bukan sekadar ada duit je atau dekat dengan Baitullah baru boleh dikerjakan. Istilah Tetamu Allah itu yang sebenarnya menjadi penyebab seseorang itu mengerjakan haji. Kehadiran mereka atas jemputan dan keizinan Dia jua.



Artikel tu pulak aku tengok macam ada unsur-unsur nak memecah belahkan umat Islam. Tak mustahil kalau aku katakan bahawa artikel itu mungkin juga salah satu perancangan Yahudi nak memesongkan fahaman umat Islam dari ajaran sebenar.

Sabda Rasulullah s.a.w yang bermaksud:-
“Sahabat-sahabatku umpama bintang-bintang ( di langit). Maka sesiapa pun di kalangan mereka yang kamu ikuti (teladani), nescaya kamu akan mendapat petunjuk”. (Riwayat Al Baihaqi dan Ad Dailamiy). - Ihsan awit1910.


So???...
 
Last edited:
ni lah padahnya segala benda atas muka bumi ..sampai keterlaluan dan berani menolak sifat Iradat Allah Taala..memilih Al quran dalam bahasa Arab? Ni bala sebab semua benda nak hujah Aqal...musibah musibah.. pergi ngaji la...
 
ni lah padahnya segala benda atas muka bumi ..sampai keterlaluan dan berani menolak sifat Iradat Allah Taala..memilih Al quran dalam bahasa Arab? Ni bala sebab semua benda nak hujah Aqal...musibah musibah.. pergi ngaji la...

Dia dah ngaji la tu.. tapi lain sikiiit je pengajian dia. :D:D
 
mengarut je thread nie. semua main pakai agak2. fakta sejarah YANG SAH xde pon...
 
utk rujukan semua...

ulasan yg dah dibuat ke atas buku Aidid Saffar, "Mental Bondage: In The Name of Islam"...

ammal07, "Lapangkan minda dan baca ulasan ini dan anda nilaikannya sendiri"...

Aidid Safar on Hajj Verse 22:25~30
« on: August 09, 2007, 06:35:38 AM »
Salamun Aalaikum.

I was reading Aidid Safar's Arab conspiracies on the Hajj topic and trying to make sense of his translation of 22:25~30. Therefore I broke up the Arabic words in this verse and try to correlate with the translation given by Aidid.

Indeed some of the words translation was explained by Aidid in his book (e.g Bait = System), however there are some words in his translation are not justified or without any reference(to my knowledge), some are also left out from his "literal" translation.

Here I compare the translation of Aidid with my personal translation with the reference of dictionary and a translation in my local language. I have bolded Aidid's translation which i could not find any reference. Therefore i urge brothers and sisters to verify and Aidid's and my translation and point to me if i did some error in my translation


1st row is a transliteration 2nd row is Aidid's translation, 3rd row is mine
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Aidid
22:25 Indeed those who disbelieve and they prevent others from the sanctioned submission (masjidil-harami) which was set for mankind to be devoted equally that is very apparent. And whosoever introduces in it any wickedness We will make him suffer the retribution.

Literal;
22:25 Indeed those who disbelieve and hinder from the way of God and the Forbidden Mosque which we made for mankind equal (to) the devoted in it and the visitors and whosoever intends therein of deviation with wrongdoings, We make him taste of a painful punishment

22:25



Aidid
22:26 And when We settled for Abraham a place in the system (We said to him), ‘You shall not associate Me with anything, keep My system (bayti-ya) cleansed for the groups of people who are upright and humble in submission’.

Literal
22:26 And when We assigned to Abraham site (of) the House, that “(Do) not associate with Me anything and purify My House for those who circumbulate, and those who stand and those who bow, those who prostrate.

22:26


Aidid
22:27 And announce to the people with the challenge that was given to you as man and upon every responsible individuals that was given from every resource enormously

Literal
22:27 And proclaim to mankind to the pilgrimage, they will come to you walking and on every lean animals , they come from every mountain highway distant

22:27



Aidid
22:28 so that they witness the benefits for them and that they will remember God’s name during the days known to them over whatever provisions (We gave) to them from the animal livestock. Therefore eat from it and feed the needy and the poor.

Literal
2:28 That they may witness benefits for them and they mention (the) name (of) God on days known over what He provided them from them, from animals livestock, so eat from it and feed the miserable, the poor.

22:28



Aidid
22:29 And then they should remove their impurity and they should fulfil their covenants and they should go about with the original system (baytil-ateeq).

Literal
22:29 Then they should make and end (of) theur impurities and they should fulfill their duties and encircle around at the Ancient House.

22:29



Aidid
22:30 And whosoever honour God’s restrictions it is therefore righteousness for him by His Lord. And permitted upon you the livestock except what has been recited to you and avoid the uncleanness of idol worship and stay away from false utterances.

Literal
22:30 That and who honour (the) rites (of) God, so it is better for him by his Lord; and lawful for you livestock except what is being recited on you, so avoid obscenity from the idols and avoid falsehood words

22:30



-----------------------------------------------------------------
Any comments/correction or reference for Aidid's translation is very appriciated

salam​
 
utk rujukan semua...

bidasan bg buku tulisan Aidid Saffar, "Mental Bondage: In The Name of Islam"...


Aidid Safar and Aastana: NOT Qur'anic Islam
By:Mubashir, Canada
Date: Friday, 13 July 2012, 7:21 am

Aidid Safar and Aastana: NOT Qur'anic Islam

In recent years we have seen some serious nonsense being passed off as "Qur'an based Islam". One of the most egregious is the book "Arab Conspiracies Against the Quran" by Aidid Safar (a pseudonym). He even had a "translation" based on the artificial Arabic he invents in his book. More recently we see "Aastana Research" by Qamar Zaman. Let me make this very simple: 1. Aidid Safar, Qamar Zaman, and those who follow them believe that a historical conspiracy changed the meaning of key Arabic words, and in the process corrupted our understanding of the Quran. 2. For this to be true there would have to be a requisite etymological discontinuity, which we DO NOT find. 3. Thus their conspiracy theory is disproved. To understand the term requisite etymological discontinuity we need to remember that

1.Arabic existed prior to the revelation of the Quran.
2.Arabic is connected to and a part of a larger family of languages such as Syriac, Aramaic, Hebrew, and others.
3.Most Arabic word have their cognates (root relatives) in these other languages
4.The other languages are interrelated AND HAVE HISTORIES that pre-date the Quran.

So, let us assume someone in the first century AH decided to change the meaning of a Quranic Arabic word. While such a person or group might - conceivably - be able to ride all over Arabia eliminating evidence of the old meaning, THEY WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO AFFECT OR ERASE the cognates of that word in all of the languages related to Arabic. This failure would leave a set of obvious language breaks between the "revised" Arabic and the rest of the linguistic web to which Arabic belongs. This language break (etymological discontinuity) MUST BE PRESENT for the Aidid Safar / Qamar Zaman hypothesis to be true. It is a prerequisite for any such hypothesis. It is not present. Thus the hypothesis is false.

G. Waleed Kavalec
www.islamawakened.com
​
 
Back
Top
Log in Register