BTC USD 56,977.5 Gold USD 1,771.00
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

Covid-19 Nak percaya kpd apa? Nak percaya kpd siapa?

Jedi

CG Top Poster Club
Messages
45,601
Paid Membership
Joined
Feb 15, 2009
Messages
45,601
Reaction score
2,562
Points
201
Thank you next.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Post

jaws_am

Legendary Member
Messages
17,759
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
17,759
Reaction score
7,145
Points
321
Fact-checker kata spike protein selamat.

Source, 16 Jun2021
1634957109700.png
Saintis di Doctors For Covid Ethics kata spike protein merbahaya kpd tubuh.
Spike Protein toksid
1634957237659.png
Selidik sendiri mana 1 nak percaya.

Pada pendapat aku..
Base on apa yg aku baca dan aku lihat..

Jika badan sihat, spike protien ni okay je..
Cuma bila badan x sihat, spike protien akan bawa masalah..
 

konaLeper

Fun Poster
Messages
757
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Messages
757
Reaction score
524
Points
71
Pada pendapat aku..
Base on apa yg aku baca dan aku lihat..

Jika badan sihat, spike protien ni okay je..
Cuma bila badan x sihat, spike protien akan bawa masalah..
Bos bgtau camne nak pindah posting ke rumah sebelah.
Sementara tu tlg pindah posting ni ke mega thread.
 

konaLeper

Fun Poster
Messages
757
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Messages
757
Reaction score
524
Points
71
Thank you next.
Bos boleh baca sini.
Tengok, boleh nangis atau boleh gelak ata x rasa apa2.
Kucing ni ada hanya utk dijadikan bahan kajian bagi kemajuan sains.
Puncak kajian adalah melakukan eksperimen ke atas manusia.
Kejahatan manusia sanggup lakukan atas nama kebaikan yg lebih besar (greater good).
Ni jenis manusia yg sedang dihadapi harini.
Periksa diri sendiri, duduk dgn pihak mana?
What we are about to denounce is too monstrous to be credible, too far from the idea of man "created in the image of God". Nevertheless, the fact is this: small beings "created in the image of God" are removed from the womb of the mother to be deep frozen or preserved in formalin while still alive, decapitated, cut into pieces, ground into pulp, spun by centrifugal force and pressed to extract "the juice" from them. However, to make this incredible truth believable, we shall take one thing at a time.





Already in the last century, vivisection of human beings was explicitly prophesied even if, in the words of those who uttered it, a certain regret is discernable for "a coveted but unattainable goal". Claude Bernard advocated the "vivisection of human beings as the ultimate goal of experimental medicine." (Bernard, C., "Princípes de Médicine Experimentale" (work published posthumously). Later, E.E. Slosson, a vivisector and professor at the University of Wyoming, declared:

"A human life is nothing compared with a new fact. The aim of Science is the advancement of human knowledge at any sacrifice of human life. If cats and guinnea-pigs can be put to any better use than to advance science, we do not know of what it is. We don't know of any higher use we can put man to." (From "The Independent", New York, 12 December 1895.)


So the two prophets, Claude Bernard and E.E. Slosson, at the end of the last century delivered to a "fin-de-siècle" humanity the golden calf of a new religion which demands human sacrifices: that 'scientism' which longs for "the advancement of knowledge at the cost of any sacrifice of human life." And now a final question: "But, after all, what are those tissues used for?"

Our answer will be disappointing: "We still know very little about it."

Professor Herranz refers to the use of embryo tissues for cell cultures in vitro:

"..... to obtain embryo cells, embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used nor can those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms. The correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be guaranteed. In either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture, a programmed abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting it while still alive to remove tissues to be placed in culture media."
Given these premises we find ourselves facing the following dilemma: can we justify on ethical grounds the deliberate, systematic destruction of a human creature to obtain cell material, even though it is recognised that this is of great interest in fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human illnesses? In other words, are research and diagnosis of such great value as to jusfify the destruction of human beings? A declaration of the Permanent Committee of Medical Doctors of the European Community and of the World Medical Association, published in November 1985 states:

"A human embryo, cannot be considered as laboratory material but rather as a potential human being. The respect which is due to it implies, in consequence, that any research should be subordinated to the Helsinki and Tokyo Declarations, adopted in 1975 by the World Medical Association." Here is an extract:
"Concern for the individual should always prevail over those of Science and Society... The medical doctor has the duty to protect the life and health of persons undergoing biomedical research."
"It does not seem to me", Professor Herranz continues, "that these principles are compatible with programmed abortions carried out to obtain cell cultures. I cannot repudiate this negative view even if the women themselves want a termination and despite the fact that scientific, diagnostic and commercial interests have combined to create a climate of opinion which make it seem desirable. The Geneva Declaration affirms that the doctor has the duty to take the greatest care to safeguard the life of a human being from its conception and will not, even under threat, use his knowledge to infringe humanitarian laws. Human embryos are the weakest members of the human family. They are the object of unjust discrimination in the case of abortion. In contrast to what happens to other minorities that are discriminated against, human embryos have hardly anyone to defend them." (*9)
 

jaws_am

Legendary Member
Messages
17,759
Joined
May 29, 2008
Messages
17,759
Reaction score
7,145
Points
321
Bos bgtau camne nak pindah posting ke rumah sebelah.
Sementara tu tlg pindah posting ni ke mega thread.

Continue je kt thread ni..
mix2 thread pun okay je..

Sebab thread ni fokus kpd nak percaya dkt spe ?
Boleh bawa info yg lebih ilmiah untuk diperdebatkan dgn mana2 ahli cg..
 

konaLeper

Fun Poster
Messages
757
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Messages
757
Reaction score
524
Points
71
.......................
BoilingFrogs-1.jpg

..............
BoilingFrogs-2.jpg
 

Attachments

  • BoilingFrogs-1.jpg
    BoilingFrogs-1.jpg
    53.1 KB · Views: 0

konaLeper

Fun Poster
Messages
757
Joined
Dec 22, 2016
Messages
757
Reaction score
524
Points
71
Giler x de tepi.
Nak percaya kpd apa lagi? Nak percaya kpd siapa lagi?
Selepas 18 bulan fauci dan gates ngaku bek$sin x berkesan.
Layan.

Sumber
In an interview for the New York Times podcast Friday, Nov. 12, Fauci said that the vaccines do not work as advertised and that Americans are facing severely waning immunity to COVID-19.

“We’re starting to see waning immunity against infection and waning immunity in the beginning aspect of hospitalization,” said Fauci. He compared America’s situation to Israel, whose current ordeal can serve as a blueprint for what the United States might end up facing.

“They are seeing a waning of immunity not only against infection but against hospitalization and to some extent death, which is starting to now involve all age groups. It isn’t just the elderly,” said Fauci.

“It’s waning to the point that you’re seeing more and more people getting breakthrough infections, and more and more of those people who are getting breakthrough infections are winding up in the hospital.”

Fauci’s solution to this problem is to promote more vaccinations. He said that fully vaccinated people should get their booster doses immediately.
Penyelesaian disyorkan: Dapatkan booster.
“You know, we didn’t have vaccines that block transmission. We got vaccines that help you with your health, but they only slightly reduced transmission,” said Gates. “We need a new way of doing the vaccine. We didn’t get much in the way of therapeutics.”

Gates’ admission comes despite the fact that he is one of the single largest proponents of presently-available COVID-19 vaccines and has aggressively pushed for these rushed, experimental and deadly vaccines to be injected into every man, woman and child on the planet.

The billionaire tech giant is also responsible for promoting and funding initiatives for the creation of COVID-19 vaccine passports globally. He has also promoted and defended tyrannical coronavirus lockdowns which do not stop the spread of the virus.

Dakota Christensen, writing for Rebel News, pointed out how hypocritical it is that Gates can freely make statements like this without fear of censorship.
Penyelesaian disyorkan: Bangunkan bek$sin baru yg dapat halang transmisi.
$$$$ lagi.
 
Sponsored Post
Top
Log in Register