BTC USD 42,465.9 Gold USD 1,778.65
Time now: Jun 1, 12:00 AM

Kes rasuah Adnan Mansor : Adnan bebas, HIDUP RASUAH!!

dausbiz

CG Hardcore Club
Paid Membership
Joined
Apr 27, 2015
Messages
52,008
Reaction score
1,722
Points
596
Aset lebih rm1 billion wow

Hidup leh party every night huhu
 
Sponsored Post

cek mek molek

CG Hardcore Club
Paid Membership
Top Poster #2
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
89,872
Reaction score
14,756
Points
1,906

Ku Nan acquitted, prosecution to appeal​


  • Saturday, 17 Jul 2021

1626569821952.png



Day in court: Tengku Adnan (second from left) arriving at the Federal Court in Putrajaya. — Bernama

PUTRAJAYA: Former Federal Territories minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor has walked out a free man after the Court of Appeal here acquitted and discharged him from his RM2mil corruption case, although the prosecution intends to file an appeal.

His conviction and sentence – he was handed 12 months’ jail and a RM2mil fine – were set aside by the appellate court in a 2-1 majority decision here yesterday.

Deputy public prosecutor Asmah Musa told reporters that the prosecution would be filing an appeal with the Federal Court.
The majority decision yesterday was handed down by Justice Suraya Othman who chaired a three-man panel.

The court found that the RM2mil deposited into the bank account of Tadmansori Holdings Sdn Bhd was a political donation as testified by several witnesses, including the prosecution’s own star witness Tan Sri Chai Kin Kong.

Chai, who is the director of Aset Kayamas Sdn Bhd (AKSB), had testified during cross-examination that the sum of RM2mil was a political donation and not meant for the appellant.

“In short, the purpose of which the money was utilised for the two by-elections (Kuala Kangsar and Sungai Besar) was made clear to Chai,” said Justice Suraya.

She added that the prosecution had failed to re-examine Chai’s testimony on this particular evidence of political donation, which amounted to an acceptance of Chai’s testimony.

The prosecution did not suggest that Chai was dishonest or untruthful and did not make any attempt to impeach or treat him as a hostile witness, she said.




“Further, in his grounds of judgment, the learned High Court judge had not directed his mind to the failure of the prosecution to at least re-examine Chai on his evidence that the RM2mil was a political donation to Umno.

“We find that such a failure on such a critical point or issue amounted to a non-direction which rendered the conviction unsafe,” Justice Suraya said.

The prosecution, in its submission, had contended that the RM2mil was paid to the appellant for himself as the cheque was credited into the account of Tadmansori and there was no corresponding payment from Umno to Tadmansori.

“In our judgment, crediting the RM2mil cheque into Tadmansori did not lead to an irresistible conclusion that the appellant had committed the offence charged.

“And this, per se, is insufficient to convict the appellant as it is circumstantial evidence which does not point irresistibly to the guilt of the appellant,” she said, adding that the trial judge should have discharged and acquitted Tengku Adnan in December last year.
Justice Ahmad Nasfy Yasin affirmed the majority decision.

Meanwhile, Justice Abu Bakar Jais, in his dissenting view, agreed with the trial judge’s finding that the appellant had received the RM2mil cheque for himself.

He found the RM2mil cheque was not a political donation for Umno as the appellant had asserted because the cheque was issued to Tadmansori, a company in which the appellant held a 99.99% stake.

“I’m also of the view that it was self-serving for the accused to say that he had requested Chai to issue the cheque to Tadmansori instead of Umno because he had used his own money for Umno.

“He was unable to prove that he had used exactly that amount for Umno,” Justice Abu Bakar said.

Tengku Adnan, together with his family and supporters, were seen reciting prayers outside of the court complex after the proceedings ended. He left immediately without speaking to the press.

Tengku Adnan, 70, was charged in his capacity as Federal Territories Minister, and was accused of committing the offence at CIMB Bank Bhd, Damansara Town Centre branch here on June 14, 2016, under Section 165 of the Penal Code.


https://carigold.com/forum/threads/...a-terima-rasuah-lebih-rm11-juta.729491/page-4
post #35
 

cek mek molek

CG Hardcore Club
Paid Membership
Top Poster #2
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
89,872
Reaction score
14,756
Points
1,906
pendakwaan failkan rayuan kat Mahkamah Persekutuan
 

midi2020

Super Active Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2012
Messages
5,777
Reaction score
313
Points
91
apa yg berlaku pada ku nan pastinya akan membawa sinar harapan pada geng-geng mahkamah lain..

ini satu perkembangan yg positif..

ada cahaya di hujung terowong buat geng mahkamah...
 

stonecold88

Active+ Member
Joined
May 31, 2009
Messages
4,302
Reaction score
849
Points
81
Klu disabit salah haa bagus kerajaan klu tak bersalah haa ni kerajaan rasuah.... Aptb yg dinamakn manusia 😉
 

cek mek molek

CG Hardcore Club
Paid Membership
Top Poster #2
Joined
Jun 3, 2013
Messages
89,872
Reaction score
14,756
Points
1,906
#NSTnation It is learnt the #AGC filed the appeal at the Federal Court today after reviewing the Court of Appeal's decision to free Tengku Adnan or Ku Nan over the RM2 million graft charge and 12-month jail sentence.

AGC files appeal against Ku Nan's acquittal​


1626679364633.png


The Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) has filed a notice of appeal against the acquittal of Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor of his RM2 million corruption charge. - NSTP file pic
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (AGC) has filed a notice of appeal against the acquittal of Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor of his RM2 million corruption charge.
It is learnt the AGC filed the appeal at the Federal Court today after reviewing the Court of Appeal's decision to free Tengku Adnan or Ku Nan over the RM2 million graft charge and 12-month jail sentence.
"The appeal papers were filed at about noon today," a source said.

On Friday, a three-member bench led by Datuk Suraya Othman in a 2-1 majority decision, allowed Tengku Adnan's appeal to set aside the High Court's decision on Dec 21, last year.



Suraya said High Court Judge Mohamed Zaini Mazlan had made an error in his judgement.

She said there was no evidence to show that the key witness in the case, property tycoon Tan Sri Chai Kin Kong, had been dishonest when testifying.

She said Chai had confirmed that the money he gave Tengku Adnan was a political donation for Umno to be utilised for the by-elections in Kuala Kangsar and Sungai Besar.

Judge Datuk Ahmad Nasfy Yasin concurred with Suraya.

However, Judge Datuk Abu Bakar Jais disagreed and said the High Court was right in convicting Tengku Adnan.
In his dissenting judgment, Abu Bakar said the trial judge did not err in convicting Tengku Adnan and the prosecution had proved all the ingredients of the charge.

"There was no evidence that Tengku Adnan had spent the money for the by-elections," he said, adding that the money was not a political donation.

On Dec 21, last year, the High Court sentenced the former Federal Territories Minister to 12 months' jail after finding him guilty of corruption by receiving RM2 million for himself from a businessman.

The court also imposed a RM2 million fine on the Putrajaya Member of Parliament after ruling that the prosecution had proven its case against the accused.
Tengku Adnan was charged in his capacity as a civil servant, namely the Federal Territories Minister, with having received for himself a total of RM2 million from Chai, who is Aset Kayamas Sdn Bhd (AKSB) director.


 

shah_ae

Legendary Member
Joined
Oct 27, 2008
Messages
16,122
Reaction score
834
Points
171
Klu disabit salah haa bagus kerajaan klu tak bersalah haa ni kerajaan rasuah.... Aptb yg dinamakn manusia 😉
klau ko manusia pun ko takkan tak pelik...
yg bg rasuah dah kene dakwa,byr denda...
yg terima bleh lepas,bleh paham tak?
 

samesame

Active+ Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2011
Messages
3,478
Reaction score
781
Points
81
Org yg makan rasuah ni, mcm mana nak taubat?
Dosa dgn Allah, minta ampun
Dosa dgn manusia, minta maaf.
Dosa rasuah, macam mana?
 
Sponsored Post

CG Sponsors




Top
Log in Register